FeetFinder vs Fun With Feet

The comparison as it actually stands

	FeetFinder	Fun With Feet
Creator share	90% of every sale (stated by the platform)	Not published
Seller cost	No seller plan found in published docs	Not published
Payouts	Weekly, direct to bank, no 30-day holds	Not published
Age requirement	18+, government ID + selfie	18+, verification required
Exclusivity	None	Not published
Public terms	Terms of Service published and readable	No public pricing or terms page located

The finding that actually decides this

The most useful result of researching both platforms was not a fee difference. It was that only one of them lets you find out what it charges before you sign up.

FeetFinder publishes a Terms of Service, states its creator share on its own site, and describes its payout schedule. We could verify those claims against the platform’s own documents.

For Fun With Feet, we could not locate a public pricing or terms page. Secondary sources report $14.99 for a six-month seller subscription and a 15% commission. We have not confirmed either figure, so we do not present them as facts.

A platform that does not publish its terms is asking you to commit before you can evaluate. For a decision that involves uploading government ID and intimate-adjacent content, that is a reasonable thing to weigh.

To be fair about the limits of this: absence of a public page is not evidence of bad terms. The terms may be perfectly reasonable and simply presented after signup. But you cannot compare what you cannot read, and you should not have to sign up to find out.

Where they are genuinely similar

Both require you to be 18 or over with identity verification. Both are marketplaces that process payment rather than classifieds that leave you to arrange it. Both operate in the same oversupplied market with the same underlying demand.

Neither is a scam. This is a comparison between two functioning marketplaces.

The practical recommendation

Given no exclusivity requirement on FeetFinder, this may not need to be a single choice. Listing in more than one marketplace is one of the few levers you actually control, since your constraint is buyer demand rather than platform capacity.

If you are choosing only one to start with, the ability to read the terms first is a legitimate tiebreaker — and one that costs you nothing.

What would change this page

If Fun With Feet publishes its fee schedule, this comparison should be rewritten on the numbers. The current asymmetry is about disclosure, not quality, and we would rather compare fees than compare transparency.